Improving access to care
The trusts recognised the urgent need for a strategy to unlock their combined capacity, especially given NHS England's ambitious goal of delivering 17 million diagnostic appointments by 2025. Gateshead and Newcastle chose to innovate with their existing technology rather than invest in entirely new systems.
The trusts approached us to work in tandem as their tech partner to develop an integrated solution that connected their respective Radiology Information Systems (RIS), Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS), and Electronic Patient Records (EPR). This data architecture enabled real-time visibility and coordination of diagnostic resources across the two trusts, allowing for faster and more efficient care delivery.
Matching patient records
A core challenge for this initiative was ensuring that patient records from Newcastle could be accurately matched and synchronised with Gateshead’s records. Since Gateshead’s RIS was the main booking system used at the Community Diagnostic Centre (CDC) located at the MetroCentre, it was essential to ensure that Newcastle patients were correctly registered in Gateshead’s Patient Administration System (PAS). This integration enabled patients to receive timely care without delays caused by mismatched or incomplete records.
We addressed this challenge by building a sophisticated Patient Matching Component, which facilitated communication between the two trusts and ensured accurate synchronisation of patient data. The integration engine worked by matching patients based on identifiers such as NHS numbers and demographic data. If a match was found, the patient’s order was sent through to Gateshead’s RIS with their Gateshead Medical Record Number (MRN). If no match was found, the system registered the patient in Gateshead’s PAS, assigned them a new MRN, and then sent the order to RIS.
Ensuring data accuracy and patient safety
To ensure the highest levels of data accuracy and patient safety, the patient matching process included a manual review step for partial matches. For example, if a patient’s NHS number, gender, and birth date matched but their surname or postcode did not, the case would be flagged for manual review. This allowed administrators to compare the Newcastle and Gateshead records side by side, confirming or rejecting the match. This extra level of verification was crucial in preventing misidentification and ensuring patient safety throughout the process.